This came to me via an email. Sender is protected by no name indicated. —–
Yes, please share this Bill with everyone you can. This bill can BE USED TO FURTHER OUR CAUSE IF USED OFFENSIVELY. IT REALLY IS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FAILING TO STAND BY ALL ADOPTEES AND LETTING THE STATES PICK AND CHOSE HOW THEY ARE GOING TO TREAT US. I say this over and over… But there is NO “except for adopted persons” clause in the US Constitution. This could be an issue that would go all the way to the Supreme Court if argued properly.
… … …
Letter to the California Legislators:
Sent: 1/10/2010 11:26:56 AM Pacific Standard Time
Subject: AB 1325 (Beal & Cook) Discriminatory To Non-Native Americans
Dear California Assemblymembers:
It has been announced that AB 1325 (Beal & Cook) will go into effect in July, 2010. This bill will allow adoptions to occur without the termination of parental rights for Native children.
Why is it that Native American children relinquished for adoption are treated BETTER than non-Native American children relinquished for adoption in this State?
Why is it that ICWA protects their rights to their identities via their original birth certificate and their rights to Tribal membership? Why do they get to know who their biological parents are when they turn 18?
Now, AB 1325 takes this preferential treatment for Native American children relinquished for adoption one step further. Why is it that MY representatives in the Assembly refuse to release MY ORIGINAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE TO ME? I am 40 years old.
Please explain to me how my civil rights are less important than the civil rights of Native Americans. I look forward to a response from at least my representatives in the 1st District.
Thank you for your time,
(Name Withheld From this Post)
Here is the Tribal Alert:
You must be logged in to post a comment.