In defense of my friend, Carol Schaefer, who wrote this article today on Huffington Post: “The Right to Love: Two Social Movements Converge on One Family”, I wrote the following Letter to the New York Times.
To deny Jack Ryan’s mother , Carol Schaefer, who gave birth to her son in 1966, the joy, respect and dignity of being named as his mother alongside of the parents who raised him is to, again, slap her with the stigma of being “an unwed mother” the way she was so many decades ago.
New York Times: Your high society newspaper has chosen not to publish the names of the two people “who did the dirty” and who “had” to give up the baby to avoid being disgraced for life. Your staff has just reinforced those old stereotypes.
The shame now is on the editor and publisher and all the staff of the New York Times for disrespecting Jack Ryan’s mother and his father – the very two people who gave him life. Yet, come Mother’s Day, you will publish sentimental words honoring “all” mothers. It appears that only legal mothers are honored by your paper.
You have robbed Carol Schaefer of a once-in-a-lifetime event — of being named in your extremely-prestigious newspaper for the honor that belongs to her. Just because The New York Times is decades behind the times, does not mean we all are.
Joan M Wheeler, born as Doris M Sippel
Reunited Adoptee since 1974, Reform activist
One thought on “Concerning Jack Ryan’s Wedding Announcement in The New York Times and His Mother Carol Schaefer”
This has been an interesting two days. Several private emails between The New York Times and myself, then between me and Carol Schaefer, and then between Carol and her son and son-in-law have revealed that Carol’s son, Jack Ryan, and his spouse, Daniel Mathews, sent in emails to The New York Times just a bit too late for their request to include the names of Jack’s natural parents in the wedding announcement. So the intention was there to include both natural parents with the adoptive parents in the wedding announcement.
Comments are closed.